Customer Complaints
Record the complaint against the customer and the part.
A complaint comes in through your customer's portal, and the fix has to reach the control plan, the risk analysis and the work instruction. In VisualQMS the complaint stays linked to its investigation, the corrective action, the revised documents and the operators who confirmed the new version.

A complaint arrives through your customer's portal, and containment has to start within hours. The 8D gets written and the fix agreed. Then the PFMEA, the control plan and the work instruction each need a new revision, and they are separate Excel and Word files on a shared drive, kept by different people.
IATF 16949 asks for the control plan to be reviewed after a customer complaint and its corrective action, and for problem solving to update the PFMEA and control plan where needed. Months later a customer auditor or your certification body picks that complaint and asks what changed. A PFMEA left behind after the 8D is a finding waiting to happen.
IATF 16949 also asks you to consider similar processes and products. In VisualQMS each record is created by the person responsible and linked to the ones before it. The 8D you send your customer can be filed with the complaint.
Quality engineer
The complaint goes into Customer Complaints, recorded against the customer and the part, which can come from your ERP once it is connected. The customer's email is filed with it.
Quality
A non conformance takes it through registration, investigation and closure. Your containment actions and root-cause analysis are filed on it, in whatever form you use, including your customer's 8D form.
CAPA owner
The CAPA names who approves it and who carries it out, and has a deadline with reminders. It moves through steps such as For Implementation, For Verification and Verified, so the fix is checked before the CAPA closes.
Process engineer
Where your rules require it, a change request is approved first. The engineer opens each file in Excel, locked to them while they edit, and each new version is approved before it is published.
Operators
Where the training rule says so, publishing the new work instruction asks the operators it names to read and acknowledge it. Anyone overdue goes to their manager.
The complaint keeps its links: the investigation, the CAPA, the revised PFMEA and control plan, and who has acknowledged the new version, with earlier versions in the version history. If your control plans carry the part, the customer and the line, filter by the line, and every control plan made on it is in one list, each one step from its history.
The control plan opens in Excel, locked to the editor until it is checked back in. Each time it is checked back in, or its details change, a row is added to the version history.
Documents can carry the part, the customer and the line, so people find the control plan by what it is about. A family control plan shows under every part number it covers, with no copies in other folders.
Link a PFMEA to its control plan and the work instructions that go with it, as related documents.
Anyone who opens it in VisualQMS sees the approved revision. The version number and approval date are written into the file, so a printout at the station can be checked against the current one.
Every document has a next review date, set automatically or by hand, and the review starts when the date comes round.
With the process maps, an activity opens the latest approved work instruction. When a new version is published, the activity opens it from then on, and the map doesn't need to be republished.

A VDA 6.3 process auditor or your certification body picks a part and asks for three things: its control plan, the change behind the latest revision, and proof that operators have read the current work instruction. In VisualQMS all three hang off the same document: its version history, the complaint or change request linked to it, and the acknowledgement records for each version.
Documents and process maps can be tagged to the requirements of the standards you work to, such as IATF 16949 alongside ISO 9001, which it supplements, and you find them by going through the standard.
Internal audits run in the same system: planned, ongoing and completed audits, with each observation linked to its CAPA.
Your control plans, PFMEAs, work instructions and procedures come across with their existing numbers, and their details are added in bulk from Excel templates.
We have connected Microsoft Dynamics, M‑Files has connectors for SAP, Dynamics 365 and Salesforce, and any system with an SQL database behind it can be connected directly. For anything else we build the connection.
The modules are pre-configured and set up during implementation with your own departments, regions and roles.
Customer complaints, non conformances, CAPA, change requests and internal audits can join at the start or later.
Record the complaint against the customer and the part.
Take it through investigation to closure.
Learn moreAn owner and a deadline, with reminders.
Learn moreApprove the change before the control plan is opened.
Learn moreThe PFMEA, control plan and work instructions, approved before they are published.
Learn moreOperators acknowledge the new revision.
Learn more